Origination and Extinction
1) From my earlier lecture
we saw that the orgination of species or increase in diversity appeared
to be related to specialization of morphology.
2) Thus, the cambrian explosion
could be interpreted to be due to the rapid filling of a large number of
empty "niches". This is the origination effects.
3) The balance between origination
(e.g., diversity) and extinction.
4) From the patterns of the
fossil record can we infer something about process.
5) Finally I will talk about
biases in the fossil record.
Review of Origination and a Graphical Model
Back to the Arthropods:
- Increase in Tagmosis over time is sigmoidal
- Increase in Diversity over time is also sigmoidal.
This sigmoidal shape can be explained in terms of the rate
of origination and extinction of taxa. A simple graphical model will suffice
(board).
O = orgination, E = extinction, = the equilibrium number
of species.
From this model, we expect that O = E if negative feedback
process is in effect.
As diversity increases, O declines and/or E increases
Is diversity regulated? A simulation Model
Lets take the model of origination and extinction and apply
it to the question of regulated diversity. Raup et al. 1973 constructed
a simulation model.
Getting from the random phylogenies to the diversity map.
(overhead).
Raup et al. (1973) tested the hypothesis that the patterns
in the fossil record are due to diversity regulation about an equilibrium.
They tried to simulate the pattern. (overhead)
What they could not simulate
1) coelocanth effect - lobe-finned
fish (tuatara -- "primitive" reptile)
2) mass extinctions -- simultaneous
dissappearance of clades (5/17)
3) very rapid radiations -- explosion
of taxa onto the scene (therapsids)
Coelocanth Effect: Could
be due to endemisms and isolation -- biogeography
Very Rapid Radiations:
Adaptive zones -- A group of
similar ecological niches different from those occupied by other groups
Key innovations -- critical
new adaptations that enable an organism to use resources from which it was
previously barred (or frees up the morphology to evolve to other purposes.
Ecological replacement -- perhaps
one group replaces the other group due to superior adaptations Radiations
after Mass Extinctions (empty niches)
Logical fallacy: just because
A->B (e.g., event B always follows A) does not imply that A caused B.
Patterns of Extinctions:
A little background:
Classification system Phylum
- Class - Order - Family - Genus - Species
Geological Time Scale C O S
D M P P | T J C(K) | T Q
Background extinction rate versus mass extinction
Mass extinction typically occur at the end of a geologic
period. They are a component by which the geological period are defined
(the other is radiations).
The geologic period expressed in terms of Radiations
and Mass Extinctions:
- 4.5 bya = earth's birthday
- 3.8 bya = origin of life (bacteria = prokaryotes)
- 2.5 bya = eukaryotes (animals)
- Precambrian = 600 mya +; rich assemblage of communities
- Cambrian Explosion (600-500 mya): most major groups
except plants
- Ordovician Radiation (500-440 mya): great invert
radiations;
- filter feeders; wet terr. env. colonized by plants
- MASS EXT - Sea levels drop; cont. shelves exposed, dried up,
big
- marine extinctions: 50% animal families wiped out
- Silurian Expansion (440-400 mya): land colonized
by animals - arthropods
- Devonian Radiations (400-345 mya): great radiations
in fish, squid, tribolites;
- land plants diversify; verts invade land (amphibians)
- MASS EXT - 30% animal families, esp. large groups of fish (change
- from heavily armored to lighter, faster groups)
- Carboniferous Radiations (345-290 mya): land forests
- coal develops, first reptiles,
- arthropod radiations
- Permian (290-245 mya): giant insects, reptiles
= dom. land verts,
- arthropod radiations
- MASS EXT - gradual as Pangea forms, inland climate, glaciers
form, sea
- levels drop, 95% all marine species; 50% overall; all tribolites
- Triassic Radiations (245-195 mya): Pangea separates,
glaciers melt, warm inland
- seas,warm & humid terr env; 1st mammals arise; 1st dinosaurs
- MASS EXT: Continents drifting, 35% animal families, incl. many
inverts &
- reptiles; many marine inverts wiped out completely
- Jurassic (195-138 mya): 1st birds, radiations
by marine fish and
- terr. dinos, 1st bipedal dino predators
- Cretaceous Radiations (138-65 mya): dinos radiate,
flowering plants appear & radiate
- MASS EXT: meteor (iridium layer) - all large land verts; planktotonic
- organisms, who survives? detrietus eaters; warm blooded; plants &
- insects w/ dormant periods
- Tertiary Radiations (65-2 mya): angiosperms dominate;
rapid vertebrate radiations in
- reptiles, birds, mammals (why? climate + competition?) - earth
- drier, grasslands, grazing mammals radiate
- Quaternary (2 mya - present): incl. Pleisotcene
epoch; mult. glaciations -
- MASS EXT? Human caused? Extinctions of large birds & mammals
where
- man emigrates?
Mass Extinctions versus Background Extinctions
Raup and Sepkoski 1982 mass extinctions. (overhead)
above background
Why does the background extinction of families decline
up to the present?
Progressive Adaption -- species
are becoming well adapted to environment
versus a dynamical explanation
-- # of species in given families has been increasing
-- families with a few species are more likely to go extinct
Another argument against a purely Progressive adaptation
Van Valen 1973 and the Red Queen Hypothesis (overhead)
Within a taxonomic group the
number of species declines linearly with time.
Constant probability of extinction
Therefore, older taxa are no more likely to survive than
younger taxa.
As a group evolves, it becomes no more or less resistant
to extinction
EXPAINED: Biotic environment is deteriorating (competition,
predation). Species have to continually evolve just to keep up in
the race.
What about mass extinctions (causes)?
Example 1: Asteroid impact meets the Iridium Anomoly
at the K-T boundary
Evidence of worldwide layer of terrestrially rare Iridium
(which is common in extraterrestrial sources. Alvarez et al 1980
1) Impact site has been identified in the Yucatan peninisula.
2) Evidence of Deluge in texas and along Louisiana
3) Molecular evidence. Deluge took out the biota of the
Caribean Islands re-established after K-T boundary.
Example 2: Interstellar explanations
26 MYR periodicity to extinctions
Interestingly the milky way galaxy has a period of rotation
of ~50 MYR.
Example 3: Pleistocene extinctions
- 1. patterns
- a. terrestrial, interesting in that no marine component
- b. primarily large mammals (100 lbs+)
- c. different on various continents, "new world" hit hard;
73% NA
- genera, 80% SA genera; Africa hit the least
- d. not synchronous
- 2. alternative hypotheses
- a. climate?
- 1) expect synchronous impact
- 2) similar climate changes in early & late Pleistocene, but ext.
- primarily in late Pleistocene
- b. asteroids? Klingons?
- also expect synchronous impact globally, not observed
- c. competition
- 1) no, extinction w/o replacement
- 2) ie. horses & burros in US southwest; Perrisodactyla went
- extinct but niche persisted unfilled
- 3. human overkill hypothesis
- a. humans hunt megafauna to extinction
- b. invade new area, naieve fauna susceptible to predation style
- c. nicely explains
- 1) size difference, hunted larger species?; no marine comp.
- 2) timing difference: follows as homonids migrate from Africa
- 3) continental difference
- a) naieve fauna suffer more, no similar preds
- b) African mammals perhaps coevolved w/ hunters
- 4. correlation vs. test of hypotheses
Example 4: Current extinctions
- A. 1. current extinction based on bird/mammal rates =
- 4-40x higher than bkgrd (mass extinction defined to be at least 4X
higher)
-
- a. 20% bird species pushed to ext. brink last 2000 yrs.
- b. US migratory songbird pops down 50% in 40 yrs
- c. 20% freshwater fish worldwide on ext. brink
- d. European inverts: 17-34% endangered (by country)
- e. European fungi, est. loss 50% species
- B. Humans and K
- 1. graph of our growth over time
- 2. K previously det. by disease, food supply, water avail.
- 3. technology = raise K
- a. domestication
- b. cultivation
- c. medicine
- d. technology & farming
- 4. now K will be determined by ecosystem's ability to handle waste