Biology 20C - Fall 1998

ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY

Lecture 23: California Condor

CALIFORNIA CONDOR - Gymnogyps californianus

Evolutionary History: (ya = years ago)

2 Mya

About 7 species ranging all over North America

100 Kya

2 species: Florida - Mexico - British Columbia

10 Kya

1 species: mainly west of Rocky Mts: NW Mexico - British Columbia

500 ya

Abundant southwest deserts, Baja California, coastal CA, OR, WA, BC

100 ya

Scarce and restricted to AZ, UT, CA, southern OR, northern Baja

50 ya

Rare in coastal ranges from Monterey to San Diego

 

Census History:

Date

Total

Wild

Captive

1940s

+\- 100

+\- 100

1960

50-60

50-60

1980

25-30

25-30

(1982)

Egg and chick capture begins

1982

24-27

21-24

3

1984

15

1985

9

(1984-86)

Six dead of lead poisoning

(1987)

Last adults captured

1987

27

0

27

(1988)

First captive breeding

1988

0

1989

0

1990

40

0

40

1991

52

0

52

(1992)

First successful release

1992

65

7

56

1993

75

9

66

1994

88

3

85

1995

103

13

90

1996

120

28

92

1997

133

33

100

30 Oct

1998

150

46

104

3 wild populations: 2 Arizona; 1 California

3 zoo populations: San Diego, Los Angeles, Boise ID

  

Condor - Biological notes:

 

Life History Characteristics:

Physiology

 

Homeostatic

Body size

 

Large (12.5 kg)

 

 

 

Survival

Egg

Poor

 

Nestling

Poor

 

Fledgling

High

 

Adult

High

 

 

 

Survivorship

Egg-nestling

Type III

 

Fledgling-adult

Type I - II

 

Longevity

> 40 years

 

 

 

Fecundity

First reproduction

> 7 years

 

Last reproduction

> 40 years ?

 

Fecundity curve

Iteroparous, discrete, synchronized

 

Clutch size

Small: 1 egg per 2 years (1 female egg per 4 years)

 

Egg size

Large (280-300 g)

 

 

 

Parental care

Pair bonding

Strong - but will re-pair if one dies

 

Egg /nestling

Little; by one adult; abandon if disturbed

 

Fledgling/juvenile

Intensive; both parents aggressively defend chick

 

Duration

18 -24 months

 

 

 

Sociality

 

Well developed, interactive groups

 

 Causes of Decline (long-term):

 

Causes of Decline (since European contact):

 

Discussion of Condor Life History:

1. Complex sets of LHC, with close juxtaposition of extreme "r-selected" and extreme "K-selected" traits simultaneously, sequentially, or alternating at different time in the life cycle.

2. Such combinations cannot be explained by r- and K-selection models

3. A rarely stated assumption of r- and K-selection models is that natural selection shapes LHC during times of positive or zero population growth under favorable conditions. either when the population is growing rapidly at r, or when it is maintaining its maximum density at K.

4. This assumption cannot be true for the California Condor, which has probably experienced negative growth for much of the last 2 Ma, and has certainly experienced increasing population declines over the last 10Ka. Within the last 500 y, rates of decline have accelerated.

5. One plausible explanation of the Condor's LHC is that they have evolved primarily during negative population growth in response to natural selection by unfavorable conditions, and that such selection has increased in intensity as the population approaches extinction.

6. Natural selection favors traits of the individuals who leave relatively more descendants in future generations. This remains true even in declining populations where, on average, individuals do not even replace themselves (< 1 descendent in next generation).

7. In declining populations, an individual leaves more genes in a population through an extended lifespan that keeps its own genes in the population and provide repeated opportunities for reproduction (that are more likely to fail than succeed), than it will if it maximizes reproductive output during a short life-time. Repeated reproductive attempts increase the probability that at least one will be under sufficiently "favorable" conditions that the progeny reaches maturity

8. Viewing the condor's life history as evolutionary responses that slow the rate of population decline and delay extinction eliminate many apparent contradictions:

 

Captive Breeding vs. Habitat Protection:

The california condor almost went extinct because legal and philosophical battles between advocates of two very different approaches to conservation of endangered species prevented establishment of the captive breeding program for many years, until only 27 birds remained alive. It was feared they could not live and breed in captivity. But after capturing it was discovered:

 

California Condor WWW Sites:

http://www.cerf.net/lazoo/ctime.html

 

L.A. Zoo; general biology

 

 

http://www.dfg.ca.gov/wmd/condor.html

 

CA Dept Fish & Game; general description

 

 

http://www.amnh.org/Exhibition/Expedition/Endangered/condor/condor.html

 

Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist. NY; general notes

 

 

http://www.cerf.net/lazoo/ctime.html

 

L.A. Zoo; timeline for condor decline and recovery

 

 

http://www.cerf.net/lazoo/cstats.htm

 

L.A. Zoo; Current condor census data

 

 

http://www.perigrinefund.org/vermil.html

 

Perigrine Fund; condors in Grand Canyon area (detailed notes since 5 November 1996)

 

 

http://www.perigrinefund.org/CACondor.html

 

Perigrine Fund; condor restoration program

 

 

http://www.perigrinefund.org/map.html

 

Perigrine Fund; map of Arizona release sites

 

 

http://www.fws.gov/r9extaff/biologues/bio_cond.html

 

US Fish & Wildlife Service; notes on captive breeding & release program