 |
Ingrid
M. Parker
Department
of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology
University of California at Santa Cruz
Santa
Cruz, CA 95064
(831)
459-5017
email: parker@biology.ucsc.edu
|
RESEARCH INTERESTS
| RATES
OF SPREAD IN THE NOXIOUS INVASIVE SHRUB, SCOTCH BROOM
Invasions are driven by a combination of dispersal
and population growth. I use age-structured models and spatial models
to investigate the relative importance of factors that influence spread
in invasive species. In Washington State, I found that reproduction in
Scotch broom is strongly limited by pollinators (see Parker 1997). It
also has eliasomes and is ant-dispersed; however, spatial models showed
that the additional movement by ants is not very important relative to
demographic factors (Parker and Reichard 1998). Interestingly, the
sites where broom was most successful were the glacial outwash
prairies, an ecosystem rich in native species that has been nearly
eliminated by agriculture and development (Parker 2000).
I continue to pursue my interest in using models to
understand the relative importance of different ecological factors or
processes to spatial spread. As part of a working group run by Mike
Neubert and Hal Caswell at NCEAS, we
are applying stage-structured, analytical spatial models to link
dispersal and demography in invading species.
|
|
|
HOW
DOES SCOTCH BROOM AFFECT SPECIES COMPOSITION AND NITROGEN CONTENT IN
THE GLACIAL OUTWASH PRAIRIES?
In Washington, Scotch broom is a big,
nitrogen-fixing shrub that invades grassland ecosystems that include no
large native shrubs. Two undergraduates and I documented a change in
plant diversity and species composition when Scotch broom invades
prairie sites and old field sites (Parker et al. 1998). During my time
as a postdoc in Carla
DAntonio's lab at UC
Berkeley, I
teamed up with Karen Haubensak, the N-Fixation Queen, to investigate
whether these changes in composition were accompanied by changes in
nutrient levels in the soil. We found a significant increase in total
nitrogen, total carbon, and net nitrogen mineralization.
|
| COMPARATIVE
REPRODUCTIVE ECOLOGY OF SCOTCH AND FRENCH BROOM IN CALIFORNIA
When I moved to California, I was curious to see
whether pollinator limitation of Scotch broom is a general phenomenon,
or specific to the cold, rainy conditions of the Pacific Northwest.
Karen Haubensak and I have been studying the reproductive success of
Scotch broom and French broom in Marin County (Mt.
Tamalpais State
Park). These two exotic species are very similar, but French broom
flowers are about 10 times smaller. Scotch broom is more attractive to
pollinators, but we found that both species were pollen limited.
|
|
|
TESTING
THE "NATURAL ENEMIES HYPOTHESIS" WITH CLOVERS
It is often stated that exotic species leave their
natural enemies behind in their home range, and are therefore released
from pest pressure and free to wreak havoc on native species. Plant
pathologist and microbial ecologist Greg
Gilbert and I
are investigating the generality of this idea using clovers at the UC
Natural Reserve at Bodega
Bay. There we find 10 native and 8 exotic species of
clovers living sympatrically, and we are studying effects of pathogens
and herbivores on the fitness of individuals from all 18 species. We
find strong evidence that herbivores do prefer native species.
|
| THE
EVOLUTION OF NOVEL PLANT-PATHOGEN INTERACTIONS
Is a potential invader more likely to "escape"
pathogens, or conversely to be clobbered by new pathogens to which it
has no resistance? In experiments conducted in environmental chambers,
Greg Gilbert and I are comparing the pathogenicity and evolution of
virulence of California pathogens on native clovers, exotic clovers
collected from California, those same species collected from their
native range, and clovers that have never been grown in California.
Many of the species are native to the Mediterranean, requiring two
tedious field trips to France and Spain.
|
|
|
GENETIC
DIFFERENTIATION IN THE INVADER, COMMON MULLEIN
In California, Common mullein (Verbascum thapsus)
is now found from sea level up to 7000+ feet in the Sierra Nevada.
There are reports from resource managers at Yosemite National Park that
it may be increasing its range upward. Does this broad geographic and
environmental range reflect huge levels of phenotypic plasticity, or is
there evidence for local adaptation in high elevation populations? Do
reports of the increasing range of mullein simply reflect range
expansion of existing genotypes, or adaptation, or possibly global
warming? Stay tuned. See also Joseph's
page.
|
|
PORROCA:
THE SPREAD OF A NEW COCONUT DISEASE IN KUNA YALA, PANAMA.
The discovery and study of a novel crop disease has
an obvious practical importance. It also represents an opportunity to
study the dynamics of an invasion, and the relationship between spread
and the distribution of the host. Porroca is a disease of coconut palms
for which the causative agent is still unknown. In recent years,
porroca has entered an epidemic phase of rapid spread along the
Caribbean coast, from Colombia through Panama. With the help of the
Kuna People of San Blas (Kuna Yala), Greg
Gilbert and I
are studying the biology of porroca: determining the cause, the vector,
and the basic epidemiology, and investigating possible control options
with landscape-scale, community-based controlled experiments. A main
focus of our work is a set of detailed GPS/GIS maps of healthy and sick
palms to follow and eventually model the dynamics of spread along
linear plantations and patchy island systems.
|
|
|
IMPACTS
OF INVASIVE SPECIES: TOWARD A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK
Although ecologists commonly refer to the impacts
of nonindigenous species, little formal attention has been given to
defining what we mean by impact, or connecting ecological theory with
particular impact measures. The resulting lack of generalizations
regarding invasion impacts is more than an academic problem; we need to
be able to distinguish invaders with minor effects from those with
large effects in order to prioritize management efforts. Our working
group at the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (NCEAS)
focused on defining, evaluating, and comparing the ways people measure
impact (Parker et al. 1999). Are the results of complex multivariate
methods adequately captured by simple composite metrics such as species
richness? How well are impacts on native populations correlated with
impacts on ecosystem functions, and which drive which? Are there useful
bioindicators for invasion impacts? To what extent does the impact of
an invasive species depend on the system in which it is measured? Three
approaches would provide new insights in this line of inquiry: 1)
studies that measure impacts at multiple scales and multiple levels of
organization, 2) studies that synthesize currently available data on
different response variables, and 3) models designed to guide empirical
work and explore generalities.
|
PUBLICATIONS
Beckstead, J. and I.M. Parker. Invasiveness of Ammophila
arenaria: release from soil-borne pathogens? Ecology, in review.
Neubert, M.G. and I.M. Parker. Using integrodifference
equations to project rates of spread for invasive species. Risk
Analysis, in review.
Haubensak, K.A. and I.M. Parker. Invasion of Cytisus
scoparius
in glacial outwash prairies of western Washington: Determining
impacts on ecosystems. Plant Ecology, in review.
Parker, I.M., J. Rodriguez, and M.E. Loik. 2003. An
evolutionary approach to understanding the biology of invasions:
local adaptation and general purpose genotype in the weed
Verbascum thapsus. Conservation Biology, in press.
Parker, I.M. 2002. Safe site and seed limitation in
Cytisus
scoparius: Invasibility, disturbance, and the role of cryptogams
in a glacial outwash prairie. Biological Invasions 3(4): 323-332.
Parker, I.M., Engel, A., Haubensak, K.A., and Goodell,
K.
2002. Pollination of Cytisus scoparius and Genista monspessulana,
two invasive shrubs in California. Madroño 49:25-32.
Byers, J.E., Reichard, S., Smith, C.S., Parker, I.M.,
Randall,
J.M., Lonsdale, W.M., Atkinson, I.A.E., Seasted, T., Chornesky,
E., Hayes, D., Williamson, M. 2002. Directing research to reduce
the impacts of non-indigenous species. Conservation Biology
16(3):630-640.
Parker, I.M. and Haubensak, K.A. 2002. Comparative
pollinator
limitation of two non-native shrubs: Do mutualisms influence
invasions? Oecologia 130:250-258.
Hayden K.A. and Parker, I.M. 2002. Plasticity in
cyanogenesis
of Trifolium repens L: Inducibility, fitness costs and variable
expression. Evolutionary Ecology Research 4:155-168.
Sakai, A.K., Weller, S.G., Allendorf, F.W., Holt, J.S.,
Lodge,
D.M., Molofsky, J., With, K.A., Baughman, S., Cabin, R.J., Cohen,
J.E., Ellstrand, N.C., McCauley, D.E., O'Neil, P., Parker, I.M.,
and Thompson, J.N. 2001. The Population Biology of Invasive
Species. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics. 32:30532.
Parker, I.M. 2000. Invasion dynamics of Cytisus
scoparius: A
matrix model approach. Ecological Applications10(3):726-743.
Goodell, K., I.M. Parker, and G.S. Gilbert. 2000.
Biological
impacts of species invasions: Implications for policy makers. pp.
87-117, in National Research Council of the United States, ed,
Incorporating Science, Economics, and Sociology in Developing
Sanitary and Phytosanitary Standards in International Trade
(Washington: National Academy of Sciences Press).
Parker, I.M., D. Simberloff, W.M. Lonsdale, K. Goodell,
M.
Wonham, P.M. Kareiva, M.H. Williamson, B. Von Holle, P.B. Moyle,
J.E. Byers, and L. Goldwasser. 1999. Impact: Toward a framework
for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biological
Invasions 1(1):3-19.
Parker, I.M. and S.H. Reichard. 1998. Critical issues in
invasion biology for conservation science. pp.283-305, in P.L.
Fiedler and P.M. Kareiva, eds., Conservation Biology (Chapman
Hall).
Parker, I.M. 1997. Pollinator limitation of Cytisus
scoparius,
an invasive exotic shrub. Ecology 78:1457-70.
Parker, I.M., W.S. Harpole, and D. Dionne. 1997. Plant
community diversity and invasion of the exotic shrub Cytisus
scoparius: Testing hypotheses of invasibility and impact. pp.
149-162, in P.V. Dunn, and K. Ewing, eds., Ecology and
conservation of the South Puget Sound prairie landscape (Seattle:
The Nature Conservancy Press).
Parker, I.M., and Bartsch, D. 1996. Recent advances in
ecological biosafety research on the risks of transgenic plants:
a trans-continental perspective. pp. 147-161, in J. Tomiuk, K.
Wöhrmann, and A. Sentker, eds., Transgenic Organisms: Biological
and Social Implications (Basel: Birkhœuser Verlag), .
Kareiva, P., Parker, I.M., and Pascual, M. 1996. How
useful
are experiments and models in predicting the invasiveness of
genetically engineered organisms? Ecology 77(6):1670-1675.
Parker, I.M., and Kareiva, P. 1996. Assessing the risks
of
genetically engineered organisms: acceptable evidence and
reasonable doubt. Biological Conservation 78:193-203.
Ruesink, J.L., Parker, I.M., Groom, M.J., and Kareiva,
P.
1995. Guilty until proven innocent: Reducing the risks of
non-indigenous species introductions. Bioscience 45(7):465-477.
Parker, I.M., Nakamura, R., and Schemske, D.W. 1995.
Inbreeding depression in two sympatric species of Epilobium
(Onagraceae) with contrasting mating systems. The American
Journal of Botany 82(8):1007-1016.
Parker, I.M. and P. Kareiva. 1994. Assessing the risk of
invasion in genetically modified crops: An ecological
perspective. pp. 467-470, in D.D. Jones, ed., The Biosafety
Results of Field Tests of Genetically Modified Plants and
Microorganisms (University of California Division of Agriculture
and Natural Resources).
Schemske, D.W., Husband, B.C., Ruckelshaus, M.H.,
Goodwillie,
C., Parker, I.M., and Bishop, J. 1994. Evaluating approaches to
the conservation of rare and endangered plants. Ecology
75(3):584-606.
Parker, I.M., Mertens, S.K., and Schemske, D.W. 1993.
Distribution of seven native and two exotic plants in a tallgrass
prairie in southeastern Wisconsin: the importance of human
disturbance. The American Midland Naturalist 130(1):43-55.
POPULAR ARTICLES AND BOOK REVIEWS
Parker, I.M. 2001. Invasion ecology: echoes of Elton in
the
21st century. Review of C.S. Elton, The Ecology of Invasions by
Animals and Plants, and J. Van Driesche and R. Van Driesche,
Nature out of Place: Biological Invasions in the Global Age.
Conservation Biology.
Parker, I.M. 2000. Invasion Ecology. McGraw-Hill
Encyclopedia
of Science and Technology, 9th Edition.
Parker, I.M. 1997. Review of P. Pysek, M. Rejmanek, and
M.
Wade, eds., Plant Invasions: General Aspects and Special
Problems. The Quarterly Review of Biology 72(2):208.
Kareiva, P., and Parker, I.M. 1995. Developing a case
study
method for conservation biology. Ecology 76(3): 1023-1024.